News and latest photography from photojournalist Robert L. Jones. This blog is proudly a film photography blog
Showing posts with label black and white. Show all posts
Showing posts with label black and white. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
A Steam-tastic Invention
While visiting Vancouver, one must stop into Gastown and take a look at the steam-powered clock that has become a major tourist attraction, and rightly so. While boasting a vintage appeal, the clock was actually constructed in 1977 as a means to cover a steam grate and also prevent the homeless from sleeping on it in cold weather. At first the clock was wrought with malfunctions and had to be powered electronically, but once the local businesses saw how much revenue it bought in because of the tourists it brought, they grouped together to have the steam mechanism completely rebuilt.
Once completed, the new steam mechanism worked by a miniature steam engine that drives a chain lift. The chain lift then moves steel balls upwards where they are then transferred to a descending chain. The weight of these steel balls on the chain controls a conventional pendulum clock escapement that is geared to the hands on the four separate faces of the clock. The steam also powers a whistle, instead of chimes, that have become known as the Westminster "chime" to denote the time.
The long exposure of this photo and the black and white aspect give it a very "Sherlock Holmes" feel while the lights on the trees add a fairy tale-esque dimension that draw you in and pull your attention to the clock itself. Think Scotland Yard meets Peter Pan.
This image was taken in March 2014 using a Hasselblad 500C with a Zeiss Planar 80mm/f 2.8. Exposure time was f/22 at 1 minute on Agfapan APX 25 Film.
Labels:
agfapan apx 25,
black and white,
black and white film,
canada,
film,
hasselblad,
travel,
vancouver
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Vivian Maier and Sins of Omission
![]() | |||
Vivian Maier, street photographer, c. 1950s |
In all the reading I have done about Vivian Maier, the celebrated photographers (many of whom cannot touch her work - e.g., Mary Ellen Mark) and critics who now fawn over her work, all offer many theories as to why she never put her work out there. Most are plausible: She was rather private, she lived for the trip of the shutter, not the adulation, and so on.
Yet, what goes unspoken in the thousands of words I've read is this: Vivian Maier was an intelligent, educated woman, yet took menial jobs to finance her own photography. It would be wrong to say she was not ambitious. However, Maier kept her only work to herself and a few close acquaintances. Perhaps she understood the very nature of the sort of people who run the fine arts photography racket.
Perhaps Maier, living in New York and Chicago, had taken her portfolio around. And, perhaps after the first couple dozen times being shown the door by the curator-in-black-turtleneck types, she gave up trying.
Perhaps she got bitterly resentful of seeing lesser talents lauded because they had the social skills she lacked - running the gamut from schmoozing, sycophancy, making Faustian bargains, domineering, to backbiting - to "make it" in the gallery scene and the Museum of Modern Art.
And now, that she is dead, her estate having been purchased for a song by people who are at present living the good life, after she spent the last decade of her life living in penury, scraping by on her Social Security checks.
The people now making a very comfortable living off her abandoned negatives and prints have brought in all sorts of the hangers-on of the art scene to laud her in death. How magnanimous they are. Now.
I wonder what kind of experience Maier had when she approached the forebears of these taste-makers and gatekeepers of the art world. I wonder if she even approached them at all. Perhaps she was onto them, all along, and knew she would never last a moment among all those social climbers.
As long as this possibility goes unspoken (and it certainly is going unspoken, not even the bread crumbs of hints have been strewn in the wake of her sudden posthumous fame) - from people who know damn well what game they are playing, and who haven't the consciences to care when they crush the aspirations of young artists, and who call people who've already made it "emerging artists," we cannot help but assume that the praise they're heaping on her now is to cover their own asses and assets.
Yet, what goes unspoken in the thousands of words I've read is this: Vivian Maier was an intelligent, educated woman, yet took menial jobs to finance her own photography. It would be wrong to say she was not ambitious. However, Maier kept her only work to herself and a few close acquaintances. Perhaps she understood the very nature of the sort of people who run the fine arts photography racket.
Perhaps Maier, living in New York and Chicago, had taken her portfolio around. And, perhaps after the first couple dozen times being shown the door by the curator-in-black-turtleneck types, she gave up trying.
Perhaps she got bitterly resentful of seeing lesser talents lauded because they had the social skills she lacked - running the gamut from schmoozing, sycophancy, making Faustian bargains, domineering, to backbiting - to "make it" in the gallery scene and the Museum of Modern Art.
And now, that she is dead, her estate having been purchased for a song by people who are at present living the good life, after she spent the last decade of her life living in penury, scraping by on her Social Security checks.
The people now making a very comfortable living off her abandoned negatives and prints have brought in all sorts of the hangers-on of the art scene to laud her in death. How magnanimous they are. Now.
I wonder what kind of experience Maier had when she approached the forebears of these taste-makers and gatekeepers of the art world. I wonder if she even approached them at all. Perhaps she was onto them, all along, and knew she would never last a moment among all those social climbers.
As long as this possibility goes unspoken (and it certainly is going unspoken, not even the bread crumbs of hints have been strewn in the wake of her sudden posthumous fame) - from people who know damn well what game they are playing, and who haven't the consciences to care when they crush the aspirations of young artists, and who call people who've already made it "emerging artists," we cannot help but assume that the praise they're heaping on her now is to cover their own asses and assets.
Labels:
black and white,
chicago,
fine arts photography,
moma,
new york,
rolleiflex,
vivian maier
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Los Colores de Coahuila - Desaturated
Piedras Negras, Coahuila, March 2000
Another quiet exposure that looks better in black and white than color.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)